Broker Credibility Review
Reviewing licence status, legal structure, operating history, information transparency, and quality of services provided to Persian-speaking users.
See broker review →
Transparency, documentation, and the right of reply
About BrokerAlarm —
About BrokerAlarm —
the independent trader's voice
BrokerAlarm was built for one clear purpose: to help Persian-speaking traders understand brokers more accurately before depositing their capital, and to give them a defined path for documenting experiences, filing complaints, and submitting evidence when problems arise.
✓Reviewed before published
✓Claims separated from evidence
✓Brokers have the right of reply
What is BrokerAlarm?
View our methodology →
An independent platform for reviewing forex broker credibility, publishing investigative case files, recording trader experiences, and helping people make more informed broker choices.
Behind every report is a review process
Our goal is not to publish claims quickly. It is to separate reliable information from unverified accounts.
Who we are
We are not an advertising outlet — we are a review and warning platform
BrokerAlarm was built with a focus on the Persian-speaking forex market — a market where choosing the wrong broker can lead to withdrawal delays, frozen accounts, unclear trading rules, and near-impossible complaints processes.
We bring scattered information together, analyse verifiable documentation, carefully weigh user accounts, and publish conclusions in plain language. Throughout this process, we distinguish clearly between personal experience, an unverified claim, a warning sign, and a proven violation.
To read our published reports, visit the broker exposé archive. To see a structured broker review in practice, check the broker review page.
Our mission
Four things BrokerAlarm does for traders
Our goal is not to make decisions for users. It is to provide clearer information and practical paths for research, comparison, and follow-up.
Publishing Documented Reports
Consolidating documents, user experiences, and warning signs into reports whose logic and sources readers can follow independently.
Read the exposés →Receiving Complaints & Experiences
Creating a clear path for submitting an account of events and supporting documents — without automatically publishing every claim as established fact.
File a broker complaint →Teaching Risk Identification
Explaining criteria such as regulatory status, withdrawal processes, order execution, client agreements, and signs of misleading marketing.
Read the broker selection guide →
Editorial process
From receiving a report to publishing a finding — what steps are involved?
This process is designed to reduce error, prevent hasty judgements, and protect the rights of both users and brokers.
Information gathering
User reports, public documents, screenshots, correspondence, or information published by the broker itself are collected.
Initial verification
Chronological consistency, document legibility, apparent authenticity of information, and any internal contradictions are assessed.
Analysis & right of reply
Information is measured against defined criteria, and where relevant, the other party is given the opportunity to provide a response.
Publication & updates
Findings are published with a clear distinction between fact, claim, and analysis. Reports can be updated if credible new information is received.
Our review criteria and limitations are documented transparently
Read our broker review methodology
For full details on how we evaluate regulation, withdrawals, trade execution, support, and user complaints, read the methodology page.
Independence & accountability
Trust is not built with slogans — it is built with transparency
Any content published about a broker can affect a user's financial decisions and a company's reputation. That is why responsible publishing matters more to us than producing fast, sensational content.
✓User claims are not treated as established fact without review.
✓Corrected information or new documentation can trigger a report update.
✓A positive recommendation does not constitute a permanent guarantee.
✓Editorial content must be clearly distinguishable from promotional material.
Areas of focus
When reviewing a broker, we look beyond the logo and the regulatory claim
A broker's credibility is built from a combination of factors. A company may perform well in one area while presenting serious risk in another. That is why our evaluation must be multi-layered and subject to revision.
Regulation & licensingThe credibility of the issuing body and the actual scope of the licence
WithdrawalsSpeed, restrictions, and the pattern of related complaints
Legal structureCompany name, registration location, and the brand's link to the legal entity
Trade executionSlippage, outages, potential manipulation, and order conditions
Contract transparencyAccount rules, bonuses, restrictions, and ambiguous clauses
Support & accountabilityQuality of issue resolution and whether complaints can actually be pursued
Where do I start?
Choose the path that fits your situation
Whether you are in the process of choosing a broker or you have already encountered a problem, the right section is available to guide you.
Read the exposés
Review our investigative case files on brokers active in the Persian-speaking market before depositing any capital.
Enter the report archive →View our recommended broker
Read a complete structured review covering credibility, accounts, withdrawals, advantages, risks, and key points.
Go to the broker page →File a complaint or report
If you have had a problem with a broker's withdrawals, account, trade execution, or responsiveness, submit your account and documentation here.
Send a report for review →
Frequently asked questions
Key questions about BrokerAlarm
Clear, concise answers about the role, approach, and limitations of this platform.
BrokerAlarm is an independent platform for reviewing forex broker credibility, publishing documented reports, recording user experiences, and helping traders make more informed decisions.
No. BrokerAlarm is an independent media and review platform. It is not a substitute for a financial regulator, a court, or a legal or financial adviser. For serious cases, pursuing formal channels remains necessary.
Regulatory status, company structure, withdrawal track record, trading conditions, client agreement, support quality, user complaints, and verifiable documentation are the main criteria. Full details are set out on the methodology page.
Through our complaint system, you can submit the broker's name, a description of events, the timeline, and any relevant documents. More precise information allows for a more thorough review.
No. Broker conditions can change over time, and no financial activity is without risk. Content on this site is for informational purposes and does not constitute a guarantee of profit, capital security, or future performance.
Research before you choose a broker. Speak up when something goes wrong.
Read the existing case files, review our methodology, and if you have experience or documentation to share, submit it through the proper channel for review.